MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911150257 · doi:10.1063/1.5084692

Large solid angle and high detection efficiency multi-element silicon drift detectors (SDD) for synchrotron based x-ray spectroscopy

2019· article· en· W2911150257 on OpenAlexaff
J. Bufon, Matteo Altissimo, Giuliana Aquilanti, P. Bellutti, G. Bertuccio, Fulvio Billè, Roberto Borghes, G. Borghi, G. Cautero, S. Ciano, A. Cicuttin, D. Cirrincione, M.L. Crespo, Sergio Fabiani, F. Ficorella, Massimo Gandola, Alessandra Gianoncelli, D. Giuressi, R. Grisonich, George Kourousias, Kasun Sameera Mannatunga, Filippo Mele, R.H. Menk, Luca Olivi, G. Orzan, A. Picciotto, A. Rachevski, I. Rashevskaya, M. Sammartini, S. Schillani, Andrea Stolfa, G. Zampa, N. Zampa, N. Zorzi, A. Vacchi

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP conference proceedings · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle Detector Development and Performance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDetectorCollimated lightContext (archaeology)SpectroscopySilicon drift detectorSynchrotronSiliconOpticsX-ray detectorOptoelectronicsPhotonMaterials sciencePhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Third and fourth generation light sources have revolutionized the research in many scientific and technological disciplines. New scientific challenges impose the construction of cutting-edge performance machines and experimental stations. In this context, off-the-shelf detection systems severely constrain the achievable results. These reasons motivated the ReDSoX research project, aiming to explore new solutions related to energy resolving imagers based on Silicon Drift Detectors (SDD), which are among the most employed acquisition devices in X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy. The main goal of the project is to develop novel versatile detection systems able to cover a large photoemission solid angle, being easily adaptable to the needs of different X-ray spectroscopy beamlines and ready to cope with high photon count-rates in order to exploit all the power of new light sources. Research efforts yielded two detector systems, dedicated to different experimental needs. The first system is composed of 32 SDD elements arranged on 4 monolithic sensors and covers a total non-collimated area of 1230 mm2. Such device is optimized for detecting low-energy photons in the 200 – 4000 eV energy range. The second detector consists of a matrix of 64 SDD elements disposed on 8 monolithic arrays covering an overall non-collimated active area of 576 mm2 and operating over an energy range between 4 and 30 keV. Both systems are highly integrated and can either be operated as an apparent large area single detector or as a multi-element detector, collecting information separately from each single element in order to enable spatially and angularly resolved advanced studies. The performances of the two detector systems have been studied at the TwinMic and XAFS beamlines (Elettra Sincrotrone Trieste, Italy), respectively. Recent results obtained during these measurements are presented and discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIP conference proceedingsSame topicParticle Detector Development and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207