MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911182666 · doi:10.4095/223860

Detrital zircon geochronology of the Archean volcano-sedimentary sequence of the Barclay belt and the Paleoproterozoic marble-quartzite sequence of the Northern Chantrey group, Boothia mainland area, Kitikmeot region, Nunavut

2007· report· en· W2911182666 on OpenAlexaffabout
Alana M. Hinchey, J J Ryan, W J Davis, L Nadeau, D T James

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZirconGeochronologyGeologyArcheanSequence (biology)GeochemistrySedimentary rockPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 'Boothia mainland area', in the Kitikmeot region of Nunavut, is located in the northern Rae Domain of the western Churchill Province. The area is characterized by variable deformed and metamorphosed volcano-sedimentary rocks of the Barclay belt; metaplutonic rocks, which dominate the region; and a marble-quartzite sequence that is informally referred to as the Northern Chantrey group. Detrital zircon geochronology studies of three samples were conducted using the Sensitive High-Resolution Ion Micro Probe to constrain the timing of deposition of the supracrustal sequences in the mapping area. Asample of psammitic schist from the volcano-sedimentary Barclay belt gave a maximum depositional age of 2764 ± 23 Ma based on the youngest detrital zircon. Two samples of psammitic schist from different stratigraphic levels within the Northern Chantrey group gave a maximum depositional age of 2454 ± 13 Ma based on the youngest detrital zircon age.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.817
Threshold uncertainty score0.364

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207