MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911212354 · doi:10.1109/epec.2018.8598356

A MATLAB Toolbox for Adjoint-Based Sensitivity Analysis of Switched Reluctance Motors

2018· article· en· W2911212354 on OpenAlexaff
Ehab Sayed, Mohamed H. Bakr, Berker Bilgin, Ali Emadi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSwitched reluctance motorFlux linkageStatorSensitivity (control systems)MATLABControl theory (sociology)Rotor (electric)TorqueFinite element methodYoke (aeronautics)Magnetic reluctanceMagnetic fluxReluctance motorInduction motorComputer scienceEngineeringMagnetic fieldPhysicsDirect torque controlMechanical engineeringMagnetElectronic engineeringSimulationStructural engineeringVoltageElectrical engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A MATLAB tool is developed for finite element and adjoint sensitivity analyses of switched reluctance motors (SRMs). The tool solves for magnetic vector potential throughout the SRM domain taking nonlinearity of magnetic materials into consideration. It then calculates electromagnetic torque, flux density, air region stored energy, and flux linkage at different rotor positions. The tool exploits structural mapping technique to control 8 geometric design parameters of SRMs. These parameters are yoke thickness, teeth height, teeth pole arc angle, and teeth taper angle of both stator and rotor. The tool also evaluates the desired sensitivities with respect to these geometric design parameters in addition to the number of turns per phase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.851
Threshold uncertainty score0.513

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207