MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911214421 · doi:10.4095/223746

The Wollaston Supergroup, stratigraphy and metallogeny of a Paleoproterozoic Wilson cycle in the Trans-Hudson Orogen, Saskatchewan

2007· report· en· W2911214421 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
G M Yeo, G D Delaney

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetallogenySupergroupStratigraphyGeologyPaleontologyGeochemistryTectonicsQuartz

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Wollaston Supergroup (revised) overlies Archean gneiss along the eastern margin of the Hearne Province. Four unconformity-bounded Paleoproterozoic siliciclastic metasedimentary sequences include minor carbonate and volcanic rocks. The ca. 2075 Ma volcanic rocks and detrital zircon grains greater than 2.37 Ga restricted to the east are interpreted as rift and passive-margin deposits, respectively. Coarsening- and fining-upward foreland basin successions (detrital zircons >1.88 Ga) underlie all of the Wollaston Domain. During the 1.86 - 1.78 Ga Trans-Hudson Orogeny, four episodes of ductile deformation generated upper-amphibolite- to granulite-facies metamorphism, except for an easternmost greenschist- to lower-amphibolite zone. Zinc-lead prospects are mainly in the middle two groups, especially at George Lake. 'Redbed'-type copper occurrences e.g. Janice Lake prospect, are mainly in the youngest group. Widespread late Trans-Hudson Orogen pegmatite and granitoid intrusions contain minor uranium. Many unconformity-associated uranium deposits of the Athabasca Basin are associated with the basal graphitic metapelite unit of the foreland basin succession.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.778
Threshold uncertainty score0.841

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207