MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911226657 · doi:10.1186/s13013-018-0154-2

Abstracts of the International Research Society on Spinal Deformities (IRSSD) Meeting 2018

2018· article· en· W2911226657 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScoliosis and Spinal Disorders · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicScoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversité de MontréalScoliosis Research Society
KeywordsCobb angleMedicineUltrasoundLumbarSpinous processOrthopedic surgeryOrthodonticsAnatomyRadiologySurgeryRadiography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

length discrepancy is the result of relative anterior lengthening or relative posterior shortening.Objective To define the discrepancy of the three-dimensional CT measured anterior-posterior length of the spinal column in idiopathic scoliosis versus controls.Methods IRB approval and patient consent was obtained.Consecutive series of high-resolution pre-operative CT scans of 80 moderate to severe AIS patients (Cobb angle: 46-109°) and scans of 30 non-scoliotic agematched controls were analyzed.The height of the anterior and posterior vertebral bodies and discs, as well as the height of the laminae, interlaminar spaces, spinous processes and interspinous spaces of the thoracic curve, and corresponding levels in controls, were measured semi-automatically in the true mid sagittal plane of each individual vertebra. Results and discussionsIn AIS, the anterior height of the vertebral bodies and discs of the thoracic curve was 3.6±2.8%longer as compared to the posterior height, 2.0±6.1% longer than the length along the laminae and 8.7±7.1% longer than the length along the spinous processes and differed from controls (controls: -2.7±2.4%,-7.4±5.2% and +0.7±7.8%;p<0.001), with the non-osseous structures contributing significantly more to the length discrepancies.In absolute lengths, the anterior side of the disc of the thoracic curve was higher in AIS (5.4±0.8 mm) than controls (4.8±1.0 mm; p<0.001), whereas the interspinous space was smaller in AIS (12.3±1.4 mm versus 14.0±1.6 mm; p<0.001) and the absolute lengths of the osseous parts differed not significantly between AIS and controls. Conclusions and significanceThe true three-dimensional anterior-posterior length discrepancy of the scoliotic thoracic curves occur through both anterior column lengthening as well as posterior column shortening, with the facet joints as the fulcrum.In moderate to severe AIS, the vertebral bodies contribute partly to the anterior-posterior length discrepancy accompanied by more significant and possibly secondary increased anterior intervertebral discs height.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.375

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScoliosis and Spinal DisordersSame topicScoliosis diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207