MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911270845 · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b05686

The Impact of Natural Variation of OH Radical Demand of Drinking Water Sources on the Optimum Operation of the UV/H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> Process

2019· article· en· W2911270845 on OpenAlexaff
Minhwan Kwon, Seonbaek Kim, Youmi Jung, Tae-Mun Hwang, Mihaela I. Stefan, Joon‐Wun Kang

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Science & Technology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAdvanced oxidation water treatment
Canadian institutionsTrojan Technologies (Canada)
FundersNational Research Foundation of Korea
KeywordsVariation (astronomy)Process (computing)Environmental scienceEnvironmental engineeringChemistryEnvironmental chemistryComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydroxyl radical (•OH) water demand is a key parameter which impacts the design and operation of UV/H 2 O 2 process for water treatment. Long-term monitoring of the •OH water demand in water sources used for drinking water production indicated significant seasonal variations of this parameter (1.59 × 10 4 to 4.98 × 10 4 s –1 ), which coincided with the occurrence of algal blooming events. Pilot-scale tests at a drinking water treatment plant confirmed that the UV/H 2 O 2 process performance for contaminant removal is predictable when the •OH water demand is accurately determined through a validated experimental method. A predictive tool was developed to identify the optimum operating conditions of the UV system with the UV/H 2 O 2 process and it was used to demonstrate the significant impact of seasonal variations of •OH water demand on the operating costs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Science & TechnologySame topicAdvanced oxidation water treatmentFrench-language works237,207