Vector Lattices Admitting a Positively Homogeneous Continuous Function Calculus
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We characterize the Archimedean vector lattices that admit a positively homogeneous continuous function calculus by showing that the following two conditions are equivalent for each $n$-tuple $\boldsymbol{x} = (x_1,\ldots ,x_n)\in X^n$, where $X$ is an Archimedean vector lattice and $n\in{\mathbb{N}}$: • there is a vector lattice homomorphism $\Phi _{\boldsymbol{x}}\colon H_n\to X$ such that $$\begin{equation*}\Phi_{\boldsymbol{x}}(\pi_i^{(n)}) = x_i\qquad (i\in\{1,\ldots,n\}),\end{equation*}$$where $H_n$ denotes the vector lattice of positively homogeneous, continuous, real-valued functions defined on ${\mathbb{R}}^n$ and $\pi _i^{(n)}\colon{\mathbb{R}}^n\to{\mathbb{R}}$ is the $i^{\text{}}$th coordinate projection;• there is a positive element $e\in X$ such that $e\geqslant \lvert x_1\rvert \vee \cdots \vee \lvert x_n\rvert$ and the norm$$\begin{equation*}\lVert x\rVert_e = \inf\bigl\{ \lambda\in[0,\infty)\:\colon\:\lvert x\rvert{\leqslant}\lambda e\bigr\},\end{equation*}$$defined for each $x$ in the order ideal $I_e$ of $X$ generated by $e$, is complete when restricted to the closed sublattice of $I_e$ generated by $x_1,\ldots ,x_n$. Moreover, we show that a vector space which admits a ‘sufficiently strong’ $H_n$-function calculus for each $n\in{\mathbb{N}}$ is automatically a vector lattice, and we explore the situation in the non-Archimedean case by showing that some non-Archimedean vector lattices admit a positively homogeneous continuous function calculus, while others do not.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it