MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911285699 · doi:10.19189/map.2018.omb.340

Sphagnum farming from species selection to the production of growing media: a review

2017· review· en· W2911285699 on OpenAlexaff
Greta Gaudig, Matthias Krebs, Anja Prager, Sabine Wichmann, Simon J. M. Caporn, M. W. Emmel, Christian Fritz, Martha D. Graf, Albert Grobe, Sebastian Gutierrez Pacheco, Sandrine Hogue-Hugron, S. Holzträger, S. Irrgang, Antti Kämäräinen, Edgar Karofeld, George W. Koch, J.F. Koebbing, S. Kumar, Izolda Matchutadze, C. Oberpaur, Jan Oestmann, P.H. Raabe, Dorothea Rammes, Lucie Rochefort, G. Schmilewksi, Jūratė Sendžikaitė, Alfons J. P. Smolders, B. St-Hilaire, B. van de Riet, Bruce S. Wright, Nicholas A. Wright, Lotta Zoch, Hans Joosten

Bibliographic record

VenueMires and Peat · 2017
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsCenter for Northern Studies
FundersLeibniz-GemeinschaftFundación para la Innovación AgrariaBundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und ReaktorsicherheitMinistry of EnvironmentUniversity of Canterbury
KeywordsSphagnumSelection (genetic algorithm)Environmental scienceProduction (economics)AgricultureAgronomyAgroforestryNature ConservationBiologyPeatEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sphagnum farming - the production of Sphagnum biomass on rewetted bogs - helps towards achieving global climate goals by halting greenhouse gas emissions from drained peat and by replacing peat with a renewable biomass alternative. Large-scale implementation of Sphagnum farming requires a wide range of know-how, from initial species selection up to the final production and use of Sphagnum biomass based growing media in horticulture. This article provides an overview of relevant knowledge accumulated over the last 15 years and identifies open questions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations76
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMires and PeatSame topicPeatlands and Wetlands EcologyFrench-language works237,207