Les députés au Parlement national du royaume des Deux-Siciles (1848) : des acteurs politiques napolitains ou italiens ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La contribution cherche à mettre en évidence les profils contrastés des députés au Parlement national napolitain pendant la révolution de 1848, en se focalisant sur les élus de la partie continentale du royaume. En se fondant sur les sources législatives et sur la très importante production publiée qu’a suscité dans le royaume l’établissement d’une institution parlementaire, alors presque inédite – le seul exemple jusque-là correspond à la brève expérience de 1820-1821 –, on s’interroge sur les ancrages territoriaux multiples de ces députés, entre leur patrie locale, la nation napolitaine et la nation italienne alors en formation. Alors que l’historiographie a souligné le tournant décisif de la révolution de 1848 dans l’intégration du royaume aux dynamiques du Risorgimento italien, les parcours des parlementaires permettent de s’interroger sur l’entrée de la société méridionale dans la modernité politique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".