MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911322977 · doi:10.14421/qh.2015.1602-01

KARAKTERISTIK TAFSIR NUSANTARA (Studi Metodologis atas Kitab Turjumun al-Mustafid Karya Syekh Abdurrauf al-Singkili)

2017· article· en· W2911322977 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur an dan Hadis · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicQur’anic Interpretation Studies
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterpretation (philosophy)PhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

"> This work tries to scrutinize an interpretation methodology on opus inNusantara (Archipelago) written by Abdurrauf al-Singkili, Tafsir Turjumunal-Mustafid. This research is a library research uses descriptive-analyticaland with historical–critical approach. I conclude that: (a) interpretationmethod that were used by Abdurrauf al-Singkili is an inter-text method; (b)refer to the exegete of surah Yasin, this work has a linguistic nuance; and (c)the approach which is used by Abdurrauf al-Singkili is textual approach,the practice of the interpretation is text-oriented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it