MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911354088 · doi:10.1002/fuce.201800056

Composite Membranes of PVDF Nanofibers Impregnated with Nafion for Increased Fuel Concentrations in Direct Methanol Fuel Cells

2019· article· en· W2911354088 on OpenAlexaff
Yahui Li, Justin Hui, Joann Kawchuk, Allen O’Brien, Zhenhua Jiang, Mina Hoorfar

Bibliographic record

VenueFuel Cells · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusKelowna General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsNafionMembraneMethanol fuelMaterials scienceMethanolProton exchange membrane fuel cellChemical engineeringDirect methanol fuel cellNanofiberSwellingComposite numberComposite materialChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic chemistryElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Serious methanol crossover of Nafion greatly limits the use of increased fuel concentrations in methanol fuel cells, which results in a decreased power density. To lower the methanol crossover of Nafion, thin layers of PVDF nanofibers were successfully electrospun and impregnated with a Nafion solution to create novel fuel cell membranes. The morphological structures, mechanical properties, thermal stabilities, chemical resistance and proton conductivity were investigated for each composite membrane. The performances of membranes with different layers of PVDF nanofibers were evaluated, using a single cell direct methanol fuel cell with 10M methanol fuel. In comparison with membranes of pure Nafion, the introduction of PVDF fiber mats greatly enhanced the membrane's thermal and oxidation stabilities, suppressed swelling ratios and water uptake, and increase fuel cell performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFuel CellsSame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207