MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911361621 · doi:10.1115/1.4042644

Energy Conversion by Nanomaterial-Based Trapezoidal-Shaped Leg of Thermoelectric Generator Considering Convection Heat Transfer Effect

2019· article· en· W2911361621 on OpenAlex
Abu Raihan Mohammad Siddique, Franziska Kratz, Shohel Mahmud, Bill Van Heyst

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Energy Resources Technology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceThermoelectric generatorThermoelectric effectHeat transferNanomaterialsThermoelectric materialsThermal conductionEnergy conversion efficiencyThermal energyThermalMechanicsThermal conductivityThermodynamicsComposite materialOptoelectronicsNanotechnologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thermoelectric generators (TEGs) can harvest energy without any negative environmental impact using low potential sources, such as waste heat, and subsequently convert that energy into electricity. Different shaped leg geometries and nanostructured thermoelectric materials have been investigated over the last decades in order to improve the thermal efficiency of the TEGs. In this paper, a numerical study on the performance analysis of a nanomaterial-based (i.e., p-type leg composed of BiSbTe nanostructured bulk alloy and n-type leg composed of Bi2Te3 with 0.1 vol % SiC nanoparticles) trapezoidal-shaped leg geometry has been investigated considering the Seebeck effect, Peltier effect, Thomson effect, Fourier heat conduction, and surface to surrounding irreversible heat transfer loss. Different surface convection heat transfer losses (h) are considered to characterize the current output, power output, and thermal efficiency at various hot surface (TH) and cold surface (TC) temperatures. Good agreement has been achieved between the numerical and analytical results. Moreover, current numerical results are compared with previous related works. The designed nanomaterial-based TEG shows better performance in terms of output current and thermal efficiency with the thermal efficiency increasing from 7.3% to 8.7% using nanomaterial instead of traditional thermoelectric materials at h = 0 W/m2K while TH is 500 K and TC is 300 K.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it