THE MEASUREMENT OF PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCY TO SCHOOL TEACHER’S ACHIEVEMENT AT PGRI UNIVERSITY YOGYAKARTA LABORATORY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan: (1) untuk mengukur prestasi kerja guru sekolah laboratorium Universitas PGRI Yogyakarta, dan (2) mendeskripsikan hasil pengukuran prestasi kerja guru sekolah laboratorium Universitas PGRI Yogyakarta ditinjau dari kompetensi profesionalisme guru. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif kuantitatif. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh guru kelas tinggi dan kepala sekolah jenjang sekolah dasar. Teknik pengambilan sampel menggunakan menggunakan teknik cluster random sampling. Teknik pengumpulan data dalam penelitian menggunakan tes dan angket. Validitas pada instrumen kompetensi profesional menggunakan validitas isi dan valditas konstruk. Adapun estimasi reliabilitas instrumen dalam penelitian ini menggunakan cronbanch alpha. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) pencapaian rerata nilai prestasi kerja guru secara keseluruhan sebesar 71,00 dari rentang skor 0-100 dan (2) terdapat 4 kecamatan dan 18 Sekolah Dasar dengan kategori rendah dalam penilaian prestasi kerja guru sekolah laboratorium Universitas PGRI Yogyakarta.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".