THE MEASUREMENT OF PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCY TO SCHOOL TEACHER’S ACHIEVEMENT AT PGRI UNIVERSITY YOGYAKARTA LABORATORY
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan: (1) untuk mengukur prestasi kerja guru sekolah laboratorium Universitas PGRI Yogyakarta, dan (2) mendeskripsikan hasil pengukuran prestasi kerja guru sekolah laboratorium Universitas PGRI Yogyakarta ditinjau dari kompetensi profesionalisme guru. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif kuantitatif. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh guru kelas tinggi dan kepala sekolah jenjang sekolah dasar. Teknik pengambilan sampel menggunakan menggunakan teknik cluster random sampling. Teknik pengumpulan data dalam penelitian menggunakan tes dan angket. Validitas pada instrumen kompetensi profesional menggunakan validitas isi dan valditas konstruk. Adapun estimasi reliabilitas instrumen dalam penelitian ini menggunakan cronbanch alpha. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) pencapaian rerata nilai prestasi kerja guru secara keseluruhan sebesar 71,00 dari rentang skor 0-100 dan (2) terdapat 4 kecamatan dan 18 Sekolah Dasar dengan kategori rendah dalam penilaian prestasi kerja guru sekolah laboratorium Universitas PGRI Yogyakarta.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it