MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911398220 · doi:10.24102/ijes.v6i4.897

Restoring and Managing Langat River Basin, Malaysia: Challenges for a Sustainable Future

2018· article· en· W2911398220 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rahmah Elfithri

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Environment and Sustainability · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFlood Risk Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental planningDrainage basinWater resource managementBusinessEnvironmental scienceGeographyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The project “Restoring and Managing Langat River Basin, Malaysia, for the Future” is an initiative carried out by LESTARI, UKM under the UNESCO framework of Sustainability Transformation across the Region (STAR) with Jap­anese Fund In Trust (JFIT) financial assistance. Sustainability science as a new emerging field can be a tool to solve a complex environmental anthropogenic is­sue by promoting an integrated approach of various disciplines, multiscale, and across stakeholder. It is a problem-driven and solution-oriented approach in cre­ating a sustainable society and requires problem-solving skills. Thus, the estab­lishment of sustainability science demo site in the Langat River Basin involved the integration of the sustainability science concepts into natural resource man­agement frameworks and processes for supporting opportunities for a more sus­tainable and resilient future. This initiative is linked with Ecohydrology, HELP, and IWRM aspects and focused on applying sustainability science principles to strengthen policy, legal, and institutional frameworks through collaborative link­ages, learning alliances, and targeted interventions for capacity building at river basin and national levels on urban stormwater management. The key objective of this sustainability science pilot project is to develop and implement a restoration and management plan for urban stormwater resources in the Langat River Basin using a sustainability science approach. Qualitative and quantitative data collec­tion in the fields of hydrology, hydrogeology, pollution sources, ecosystems, and cultural preservation as well as development of the land cover-state model is done under this study. It is shown that the Langat River Basin is small but has inherited many problems of a large river basin. This is because the river plays an important role in conservation, agriculture, and potable water supply but is facing threat from rapid development in the industry sectors and urbanization in the basin. Some key strategies and action plans have been identified to deal with is­sues related to restoring and managing Langat River Basin for the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.511
Threshold uncertainty score0.393

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Environment and SustainabilitySame topicFlood Risk Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207