MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911402941 · doi:10.6000/1929-7092.2019.08.02

Globalization and Knowledge Production in the World: A Critical Analysis of the Place of Africa

2019· article· en· W2911402941 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kelvin Bribena

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Reviews on Global Economics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Systems and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobalizationProduction (economics)Knowledge productionDevelopment economicsEconomic geographyEconomicsPolitical scienceEconomic systemEconomic growthBusinessMarket economyMacroeconomicsKnowledge managementComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adat nyirep udan dalam pernikahan di masyarakat memiliki ciri khas tersendiri yang berorientasi pada tujuan tertentu. Masyarakat Desa Gayam, misalnya, menambahkan tradisi unik ini dalam proses pernikahan mereka. Penulis menganalisis adat tersebut melalui perspektif Maslahah Mursalah, untuk menilai apakah tradisi yang diterapkan oleh masyarakat Desa Gayam memberikan manfaat yang signifikan dalam pelaksanaan pernikahan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi pelaksanaan adat nyirep udan serta mengkaji pandangan dari sudut Maslahah Mursalah terhadap tradisi tersebut. Metode yang digunakan adalah riset lapangan, yang meliputi wawancara dengan masyarakat dan observasi langsung untuk memahami pelaksanaannya. Penulis menerapkan analisis deskriptif analitik, menggambarkan fenomena atau fakta secara objektif dan akurat. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tradisi nyirep udan telah dilaksanakan secara turun-temurun di Desa Gayam, Kecamatan Bangsal, Kabupaten Mojokerto, dengan tujuan memastikan kelancaran pernikahan, kehadiran tamu undangan, serta mencegah bencana seperti hujan deras dan banjir. Tradisi ini tidak mengandung unsur yang bertentangan dengan syariat Islam, memberikan manfaat, dan masih diterima oleh masyarakat hingga saat ini.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.897
Threshold uncertainty score0.131

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Reviews on Global EconomicsSame topicEducation Systems and PolicyFrench-language works237,207