A fluoroscopic analysis of the length changes of the capsulo-osseous layer of the distal iliotibial band
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Previous studies have implicated the iliotibial band and its deeper capsulo-osseous layer as key restraints against internal rotation. However, the kinematic properties of the capsulo-osseous layer, throughout knee range of motion, are not currently known. Therefore, the purpose of this research was to quantify the length changes of this structure through various degrees of knee flexion. METHODS: Ten cadaveric knee specimens were dissected to expose the capsulo-osseous layer of the iliotibial band. Radiopaque beads were embedded, at standardized increments, into the tissue and fluoroscopic images were taken from 0° to 105° of knee flexion in 15° increments. The positions of the beads were identified in each image and the length, width, and area changes of the capsulo-osseous layer were calculated. The data were analyzed as a percent change from 0° and compared across flexion angles using a repeated-measures analysis of variance (α = 0.05). RESULTS: There was a significant increase in the length of the capsulo-osseous layer at flexion angles greater than 30°, with changes occurring primarily at the level of the femoral insertion. Meanwhile, non-homogenous decreases in width and area were found with increasing flexion angle. The distance between the capsulo-osseous layer insertion on the distal femur and proximal tibia significantly increased from 60° to 105°; maximal changes occurred at 105° [9.64 (4.12) %, p = 0.003]. CONCLUSIONS: The capsulo-osseous layer of the iliotibial band behaves in a non-isometric fashion and this work suggests that tensioning and fixation should occur between 75° and 105° of flexion, if repair or reconstruction is indicated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".