Spatially resolved cross-sectional refractive index profile of fs laser–written waveguides using a genetic algorithm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Laser-written waveguides in glass have many potential applications as photonic devices. However, there is little knowledge of the actual profile of the usually asymmetric refractive index (RI) change across the femtosecond (fs) laser-written waveguides. We show, here, a new nondestructive method to measure any symmetric or asymmetric two-dimensional RI profile of fs laser-written waveguides in transparent materials. The method is also suitable for the measurement of the RI profile of any other type of waveguide. A Mach-Zehnder interferometer is used to obtain the phase shift of light propagating transversely through the RI-modified region. A genetic algorithm is then used to determine the matching cross-sectional RI profile based on the known waveguide shape and dimensions. A validation of the method with the comparison to a RNF measurement of the industry-standard SMF-28 is presented, as well as a demonstration of its versatility with measurements on fs laser-written waveguides.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".