MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911462463

Time Series Analysis of Road Traffic Accidents in Bauchi State

2018· article· en· W2911462463 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ali Adamu, Ogundipe Adeboye Elijah

Bibliographic record

VenueATBU Journal of Science, Technology & Education · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic and Road Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutoregressive integrated moving averageAkaike information criterionTransport engineeringWork (physics)Quarter (Canadian coin)CommissionRoad trafficTime seriesBusinessGeographyEngineeringStatisticsMathematicsFinance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Road traffic accidents rate in the recent days is becoming alarming in the country given the human and technological advancement. Lot of lives are being wasted pathetically, premature deaths and destruction of scarce human and materials resources. Nigeria has a huge natural and human resources who are day by day wasted and destroyed by this controllable disaster. However, this work is based on the statistical analysis of road traffic accidents and ways of reducing it to its bearest minimum. The secondary data used in this research was collected from the Federal Road Safety Commission (FRSC) RS 12.1. Trend shows that road accidents are increasing in Bauchi and that it is highest between October and December. Time series (ARIMA) is the method used with model (1,1,1) having the least Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) selected as the best model in analyzing the collected data which clearly shows that there is an increase in road accidents over the course of the years in each quarter. Furthermore, the selected model was used to forecast four (4) years which also shows an increase. Various recommendations were made based on the findings of this work which include proper funding and provision of up to date equipment

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.818
Threshold uncertainty score0.398

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueATBU Journal of Science, Technology & EducationSame topicTraffic and Road SafetyFrench-language works237,207