MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911519575 · doi:10.1109/ssci.2018.8628906

An Evaluation Study of Recognizing Conducting Gesture Using Computational Intelligence Techniques

2018· article· en· W2911519575 on OpenAlexaff
Justin van Heek, Jack Park, Xavier Yu, Herbert H. Tsang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHand Gesture Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsTrinity Western UniversityWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGestureComputer scienceHidden Markov modelGesture recognitionMovement (music)Human–computer interactionArtificial intelligenceComputational intelligenceSpeech recognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Humans express themselves through movements. These movements range from a simple hand gesture while they are talking to the complex movements of a dancer. Musicians are highly trained artists that use their movements to invoke artistic purposes or make different sounds. This paper explores the attempt to recognize and understand the gesture of a conductor via computational means. With the ubiquitous availability of mobile phones, these devices are ideal in being utilized as tools for capturing the movement of our subject. We have implemented two computational intelligence algorithms to recognize the gesture of a conductor: a) Hidden Markov Model and b) Feed-Forward Neural Network. This paper will present the preliminary findings of the project.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score0.395

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.251
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHand Gesture Recognition SystemsFrench-language works237,207