MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911526837 · doi:10.5430/air.v7n2p87

Indoor Localization Based on Bluetooth

2019· article· en· W2911526837 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jun Yin

Bibliographic record

VenueArtificial Intelligence Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersQinglan Project of Jiangsu Province of ChinaNational Social Science Fund of ChinaSix Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu ProvinceGovernment of Jiangsu Province
KeywordsBluetoothHybrid positioning systemFingerprint (computing)Global Positioning SystemComputer sciencePositioning technologyReal-time computingProcess (computing)OutlierTerminal (telecommunication)Transmission (telecommunications)Indoor positioning systemPositioning systemWirelessComputer visionArtificial intelligenceEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Global positioning system (GPS) has been widely used in positioning, vehicle navigation and other environments. However, in indoor environments, it can not achieve accurate positioning because of the weak signal through the wall. In other words, more appropriate techniques are needed in indoor scenes. Bluetooth technology has attracted more and more attention due to its advantages of low power consumption, wide coverage and fast transmission speed. Bluetooth-based indoor positioning refers to the indoor positioning technology that uses mobile terminal to receive Bluetooth signals from multiple Bluetooth devices, and calculates the location information of mobile terminal through the received information, so as to achieve high-precision positioning.In this paper, an effective optimal location algorithm is proposed. Firstly, the outlier detection algorithm is improved to remove the interference of abnormal data on the positioning accuracy; then, different filtering algorithms are used to process the received fingerprint information to ensure the accuracy of the fingerprint database establishment stage, and reduce the unnecessary construction time; finally, the average position is calculated by the average fingerprint data and judged the user's area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArtificial Intelligence ResearchSame topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207