MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911533391 · doi:10.1289/isee.2013.p-3-24-05

Associations between persistent organic pollutants and blood pressure in a native population of Quebec (Canada)

2013· article· en· W2911533391 on OpenAlexaffabout
Béatriz Valéra, Pierre Ayotte, Paul Poirier, Éric Dewailly

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutritional Studies and Diet
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPollutantPopulationEnvironmental healthEnvironmental scienceBlood pressureEnvironmental chemistryMedicineEnvironmental protectionChemistryBiologyEcologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Recent evidence suggests that exposure to persistent organic pollutants (POPs) increase the risk of hypertension in environmentally exposed populations. High POP levels have been detected in Arctic populations and the exposure is related to high consumption of fish and marine mammals, which represents the traditional diet of these populations. Aim: We examined the associations between polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), organochlorine (OC) pesticides and hypertension among Inuit from Nunavik (Quebec, Canada). Methods: A complete set of data was obtained for 315 Inuit ? 18 years who participated in the “Santé Quebec” health survey that was conducted in the 14 villages of Nunavik. Fourteen polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and 8 OC pesticides or their metabolites were quantified in plasma samples using a gas chromatography method. Blood pressure (BP) was measured using a standardised protocol and information regarding anti-hypertensive medication was obtained through questionnaires. The associations between log-transformed POPs and hypertension (systolic BP ? 140 mm Hg, diastolic BP ? 90 mm Hg or anti-hypertensive medication) were analyzed using multiple logistic regressions. Results: Total PCBs as well as the sum of non-dioxin-like PCBs were significantly associated with higher risk of hypertension. Furthermore, the risk of hypertension increased with higher plasma concentrations of congeners 101, 105, 138 and 187. Regarding OC pesticides, p,p’-dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (p,p’-DDE) was associated with increased risk of hypertension while inverse associations were observed with p,p’-dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (p,p’-DDT), ?-hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) and oxychlordane. Conclusions: Some PCB congeners were associated with higher risk of hypertension in this highly exposed population. However, the analyses of OC pesticides revealed divergent results, which need to be confirmed in further cohort and experimental studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISEE Conference AbstractsSame topicNutritional Studies and DietFrench-language works237,207