MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911534943 · doi:10.1109/mwscas.2018.8624011

Bit Error Probability Analysis for OFDM-IM over Faded Shadowing Channel

2018· article· en· W2911534943 on OpenAlexaff
Ibrahim Aboharba, Quazi Abidur Rahman, Raveendra K. Rao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPairwise error probabilityOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingNakagami distributionFadingModulation (music)Bit error rateAlgorithmProbability of errorComputer scienceChannel (broadcasting)Quadrature amplitude modulationPhase-shift keyingMathematicsTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing with Index Modulation (OFDM-IM) has been utilized to transmit extra bits by indexing subcarriers using the ON-OFF keying modulation. In this paper, the performance of the OFDM-IM system is studied in terms of bit error probability, over a composite Nakagami-m Gamma (NG) shadowed fading channel. The closed form expressions of approximate and exact average BEP (ABEP) of M-ary QAM modulation and pairwise error probability (PEP) are derived for OFDM-IM over the aforementioned channel. The theoretical results are compared with existing research studies and verified using simulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.786
Threshold uncertainty score0.509

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207