ДІЯЛЬНІСТЬ КАНАДИ В ОРГАНІЗАЦІЇ АМЕРИКАНСЬКИХ ДЕРЖАВ (1990–2015)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Canada’s entrance into the OAS in 1990 played an important role in upgrading the organization. Human rights, democracy and security, trade and environmental protection – priority directions of cooperation between the North American country and OAS. Canada acted as the initiator of the Group for the promotion of democracy in Latin America (1995), Inter-American Committee against terrorism (1999), Committee on security (2006).Since 1994, Canada began to actively implement the decisions of the OAS on the establishment of the Free Trade Area of the Americas. Third Inter-American summit, under the aegis of Canada was held on 20–22 April 2001 in Quebec, adopted the Declaration, which stated the need to conclude the negotiations on establishing the FTAA – FTAA.Canada is a regular participant of all Inter-American summits. But the most productive and successful were: V summit of the OAS (April 2009), the Prime Minister of Canada Stephen Harper supported the idea of free trade with Latin America as its priority aim; VI summit (April 2012) showed differences between Latin American countries and the United States and Canada, created by the issue of the Cuba’s participation and supporting Argentina in the territorial dispute with Britain over the Falkland Islands (Malvinas); the VII summit of the Americas (April 2015) coinciding with the 25th anniversary of Canada's participation in the OAS.The Canadians also took part in the settlement of military conflicts between members of the OAS, and initiated the establishment of fast detection and prevention mechanism of such situations. The most difficult to Canada, during the all years of membership in the OAS was the problem of US hegemony and their propensity to impose its will on all members of the organization.In January 2015, Canada celebrated the 25th anniversary of its membership in the OAS. Nowadays, Canada defines the OAS as one of the most important multilateral means to promote mutual economic opportunity, strengthening security and establishing a long term relationship. Canada also works with the OAS to promote sustainable market in the region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".