Distinct dampening effects of progesterone on the activity of nucleus tractus solitarii neurons in rat pups
Bibliographic record
Abstract
NEW FINDINGS: What is the central question of the study? Progesterone is considered a respiratory stimulant drug, but its effect on medullary respiratory neurons are poorly documented. We investigated whether progesterone alters spontaneous activity of neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS). What is the main finding and its importance? In NTS neurons, progesterone decreases the action potential firing frequency in response to current injections and the amplitude of excitatory postsynaptic currents. Based on the established neuroprotective effect of progesterone against excitotoxicity resulting from insults, this inhibitory effect is likely to reflect inhibition of ion fluxes. These results are important because they further our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the diversity of respiratory effects of progesterone. ABSTRACT: Progesterone is known to stimulate breathing, but its actions on the respiratory control system have received limited attention. We addressed this issue at the cellular level by testing the hypothesis that progesterone augments excitatory currents at the level of the nucleus tractus solitarii (NTS). Medullary slices from juvenile male rats (14-17 days of age) containing the commissural region of the NTS (NTScom) were incubated with progesterone (1 μm) or vehicle (0.004% DMSO) for 60 min. We performed whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings of spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) in the NTScom and determined membrane properties by applying depolarizing current steps. In comparison to vehicle-treated cells, progesterone exposure attenuates the firing frequency response to current injection and reduces the EPSC amplitude without modifying the EPSC frequency or the basal membrane properties. These data do not support our hypothesis, because they indicate that incubation with progesterone attenuates intrinsic action potential generation and inhibits excitatory synaptic inputs in the NTS. Given that these results are more in line with the protective effect of progesterone against excitotoxicity resulting from various insults, we propose that progesterone acts via inhibition of ionic flux.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".