MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911625033 · doi:10.18778/8142-060-0.07

Diálogos con lo marginal. Witold Gombrowicz en la literatura argentina contemporánea

2018· book-chapter· pl· W2911625033 on OpenAlexaff
Ewa Kobyłecka–Piwońska

Bibliographic record

VenueWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego eBooks · 2018
Typebook-chapter
Languagepl
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicComparative Literary Analysis and Criticism
Canadian institutionsNovelis (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesLiterary criticismThe RenaissanceArt historyPhilosophyLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El objetivo del artículo es presentar a Witold Gombrowicz como escritor argentino. Se analiza su inclusión en el canon literario argentino echando mano de las herramientas metodológicas proporcionadas por la teoría de la “literatura mundial”. Se investigan las diferentes lecturas de su obra formuladas en el marco de la crítica literaria argentina. Finalmente, se analizan las resonancias gombrowiczianas en los textos críticos y novelísticos de César Aira.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.088

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego eBooksSame topicComparative Literary Analysis and CriticismFrench-language works237,207