MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911640708 · doi:10.1177/155019061100700207

Proud and Exhausted: Recounting the Move of the Archives of Ontario to a New Facility

2011· article· en· W2911640708 on OpenAlexaffabout
Dee Psaila

Bibliographic record

VenueCollections A Journal for Museum and Archives Professionals · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDigital and Traditional Archives Management
Canadian institutionsLibrary and Archives Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsService (business)InstitutionControl (management)Ideal (ethics)HistoryLibrary sciencePolitical scienceBusinessLawComputer scienceManagementMarketingEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Archives of Ontario move in 2009 was not only the largest move of the collection to date, but also the most ambitious and complex. In addition to the physical challenges of packing and transporting irreplaceable historical items, the move gave the institution the opportunity to go through each item in the collection to improve our overall intellectual control. The move to the Archives new facility was the beginning of the best chapter in the history of the second largest archival collection in Canada, resulting in a custom designed facility with ideal temperature and humidity controls that provides the highest level of physical and interactive service to the public.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.513
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCollections A Journal for Museum and Archives ProfessionalsSame topicDigital and Traditional Archives ManagementFrench-language works237,207