MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911654931 · doi:10.1002/mma.5424

Critical diapause portion for oscillations: Parametric trigonometric functions and their applications for Hopf bifurcation analyses

2019· article· en· W2911654931 on OpenAlexafffund
Xue Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral Infections and Vectors
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCanada Research ChairsSanofi
KeywordsDiapauseHopf bifurcationMathematicsTrigonometric functionsPopulationOscillation (cell signaling)Applied mathematicsBiological applications of bifurcation theoryBifurcationParametric statisticsTrigonometryBifurcation theoryMathematical analysisControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemEcologyLarvaComputer scienceBiologyPhysicsStatisticsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An important adaptive mechanism for ticks in respond to variable climate is diapause. Incorporating this physiological mechanism into a tick population dynamics model results in a delay differential system with multiple delays. Here, we consider a mechanistic model that takes into consideration of the development diapause by both larvae and nymph ticks, which share a common set of hosts. We introduce the concept of parametric trigonometric functions (convex combinations of two trigonometric functions with different oscillation frequencies) and explore their qualitative properties to derive an explicit formula of the critical diapause portion for the Hopf bifurcation to take place. Our work shows analytically that diapause can generate complex oscillations even though seasonality is not included.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.200
GPT teacher head0.505
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Methods in the Applied SciencesSame topicViral Infections and VectorsFrench-language works237,207