MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911682836 · doi:10.1093/brain/awz021

A probabilistic map of negative motor areas of the upper limb and face: a brain stimulation study

2019· article· en· W2911682836 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fabien Rech, Guillaume Herbet, Yann Gaudeau, Sophie Wantz Mézières, Jean-Marie Moureau, Sylvie Moritz‐Gasser, Hugues Duffau

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNIH Blueprint for Neuroscience ResearchNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsPhysical medicine and rehabilitationStimulationNeuroscienceUpper limbPsychologyFace (sociological concept)Medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Negative motor responses (NMRs) are defined as movement arrests induced by direct electrical stimulation of the brain. The NMRs manifest themselves after the disruption of a corticosubcortical network involved in motor control, referred to as the 'negative motor network'. At present, the spatial topography of the negative motor areas (NMAs) is poorly known. Hence, the objectives of the present study were to establish the first probabilistic map of the NMAs of the upper limbs and face, identify potential subareas, and investigate the NMAs' relationships with the primary motor cortex. A total of 117 patients with low grade glioma underwent awake surgery with direct electrostimulation. The Montreal Neurological Institute coordinates of sites eliciting NMRs (face and upper limbs) were registered. A probabilistic map was created, and subareas were identified in a cluster analysis. Each cluster was then plotted on the Glasser atlas and the 1200 Subjects Group Average Data from the Human Connectome Project, in order to study connectivity and compare the results with recent parcellation data. We elicited 386 NMRs (mean ± standard deviation current intensity: 2.26 ± 0.5 mA) distributed throughout the precentral gyrus in both hemispheres. In each hemisphere, we found two clusters for facial NMRs. For upper limb NMRs, we found two clusters in the right hemisphere; and three in the left. Each cluster overlapped with parcellations from the Glasser atlas. For the face, the NMAs were associated with areas 55b and 6v. For the upper limbs, the NMAs were linked to areas 6v, 6d, and 55b. Each NMA cluster showed a specific pattern of functionally connected areas, such as the inferior frontal gyrus, supplementary motor area, parietal areas, and posterior superior temporal gyrus. The white matter pathways projecting to these subareas involved the frontal aslant tract and the frontostriatal tract-both of which are well known to be associated with NMRs. This study constitutes the largest series to date of NMRs mapped to the lateral surface of both hemispheres. Rather than being randomly distributed, the NMAs appeared to be well structured and corresponded to parcellations identified by functional neuroimaging. Moreover, the white matter pathways known to drive NMRs are also connected to regions encompassing NMAs. Taken as a whole, our results suggest that NMAs belong to a large-scale modulatory motor network. Our new probabilistic map might constitute a valuable tool for use in further clinical and fundamental studies of motor control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.255
Threshold uncertainty score0.181

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations89
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrainSame topicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207