Leadership and Organizational Learning: The Determinants of Innovation Speed and Innovation Quality in Vietnamese Firms
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explore the influences of transformational leadership on organizational learning and how it relates to innovation speed and innovation quality. The paper uses structural equations modeling (SEM) to investigate the correlation between the constructs based on analyzing the empirical data collected from 250 small and medium firms in Vietnam. The results support positive and significant effects of transformational leadership on organizational learning and two aspects of innovation namely innovation speed and innovation quality. It also confirms that organizational learning acts as a mediator between transformational leadership and two types of innovation. The findings, therefore, provide clearer understanding of the relationship between transformation leadership, organizational learning and aspects of innovation. It provides managers the useful knowledge and specific pathway to enhance firm’s innovation capability to effectively response to the rapid changes of business environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it