MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sun Avoidance and the Risk of Developing Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2018· review· en· W2911692366 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicNutrition, Genetics, and Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryAlberta Health ServicesQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreast cancerMeta-analysisMedicineCancerRelative riskPhysiologyVitamin D and neurologySunlightDemographyOncologyEnvironmental healthInternal medicineConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: A relationship has been hypothesized between moderate solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure and breast cancer. This hypothesis centers on the anti-proliferative and apoptotic properties of vitamin D, as well as increases in nocturnal melatonin concentrations which have been shown to slow cellular proliferation. To date, the literature on the effects of exposure to UVR and breast cancer risk have not been systematically reviewed and synthesized. Furthermore, the effects of sun avoidance (low amounts of time spent in the sun) in different exposure windows (adolescence vs. a period relevant to diagnosis) have not been compared.Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the association between sun avoidance (defined as less than an hour of sun per day) and the risk of developing breast cancer. Associations were estimated using random effects models. Heterogeneity was investigated through subgroup analyses and I2 statistics.Results: Seven studies were included in this review with the majority (n=5) being conducted in Canada or the US. We observed an increased risk of breast cancer for individuals obtaining less than an hour of sun exposure per day during summer months compared to individuals that obtained greater than an hour (pooled relative risk (RR) = 1.15; 95% CI: 1.09-1.20). Heterogeneity among this body of literature was minimal (I2 = 2.7%) Among studies that measured sun exposure over different life periods, sun avoidance during adolescence appeared to confer a qualitatively greater risk of breast cancer than that closer to diagnosis (pooled RR = 1.18; 95% CI: 1.05-1.30 vs. 1.05; 95% CI: 0.88-1.25).Conclusion: This is the first meta-analysis to estimate the risk of developing breast cancer associated with sun avoidance. The results of this study suggest that obtaining less than one hour of sun per day during summer months, especially in adolescence, could increase the risk of developing breast cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.896
Threshold uncertainty score0.943

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it