MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911718519 · doi:10.3138/seminar.55.1.004

The Darkening of Europe: Afrofuturist Ambitions and Afropessimist Fears in Damir Lukacevic’s Dystopian Film <i>Transfer</i> (2010)

2019· article· en· W2911718519 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Priscilla Layne

Bibliographic record

VenueSeminar A Journal of Germanic Studies · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicUtopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDystopiaGermanContext (archaeology)RacismOrder (exchange)White (mutation)NationalityRace (biology)HistoryLiteratureSociologyAestheticsGender studiesArtPolitical scienceLawImmigration

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Damir Lukacevic’s dystopian film Transfer (2010) is one of a handful of recent German films that use science fiction to respond to Germans’ anxieties about the influx of refugees in the last ten years. Adapted from a short story by Spanish author Elia Barcelò, Transfer introduces a technology of body-swapping that allows wealthy, older, white customers to have their minds transferred into the younger, healthier bodies of Africans in order to prolong their lives. In this essay I analyze Transfer against the context of German science fiction film history and Germans’ more recent interest in Afrofuturism to consider how Lukacevic uses the genre to critique contemporary German attitudes about race. By comparing the film’s tragic ending to the short story’s optimistic one, I argue that while there are several moments in the film that radically undermine German assumptions about race, identity, and nationality, the tragic ending sabotages potentially positive interventions in discussions about racism in Germany.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.932
Threshold uncertainty score0.474

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeminar A Journal of Germanic StudiesSame topicUtopian, Dystopian, and Speculative FictionFrench-language works237,207