MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911748541

Continuing Care in Northern Alberta: Capacity and Collaboration

2018· article· en· W2911748541 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Lars Hällström, Emily Dymchuk, S C Woodhead-Lyons

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of rural and community development · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical sciencePopulationRural areaRural populationHumanitiesPrimary careGeographyLibrary scienceSociologyMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As rural communities face aging, population decline, and the withdrawal of public services, the provision of care in rural and northern areas becomes increasingly complex, draws from multiple and often over-lapping stakeholders and organizations, and often functions differently than in more urban or ex-urban areas. Drawing from a series of continuing care capacity workshops held in Northern Alberta, this paper presents a roadmap of both continuing care in the region, as well as a refined model for how capacity can be built, maintained and developed for continuing care practitioners and organizations. Based on five broad research questions, we demonstrate not only the differentiation between rural, Aboriginal and northern communities in terms of continuing care, but also the need to acknowledge that the factors driving the functional success of the provision of continuing care can also become weaknesses. Keywords: rural; northern; capacity; care; networks ------------------------------------------------------------------ Titre: Poursuivre les soins dans le nord de l'Alberta: capacite et collaboration Resume Alors que les communautes rurales font face au vieillissement, au declin de la population et au retrait des services publics, la prestation de soins dans les zones rurales du nord devient de plus en plus complexe et provient de multiples intervenants, souvent cumules, ainsi que des organisations qui fonctionnent souvent differemment d'autres zones plus urbaines ou ex-urbaines. A partir d'une serie d'ateliers sur la capacite des soins continus maintenus en place dans le nord de l'Alberta, cette etude presente une feuille de route des soins continus de la region ainsi qu' un modele affine sur la maniere dont la capacite peut etre construite, maintenue et developpee pour la poursuite des soins des praticiens et des organisations. Basee sur cinq grandes questions de recherche, nous demontrons non seulement la differenciation entre les communautes rurales, Autochtones et du nord d'un point de vue des soins continus, mais aussi le besoin de reconnaitre que les facteurs de reussite fonctionnelle de la provision des soins continus peuvent aussi devenir des faiblesses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.773
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of rural and community developmentSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207