Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
FPGAs are becoming more heteregeneous to better adapt to different markets, motivating rapid exploration of different blocks/tiles for FPGAs. To evaluate a new FPGA architectural idea, one should be able to accurately obtain the area, delay, and energy consumption of the block of interest. However, current FPGA circuit design tools can only model simple, homogeneous FPGA architectures with basic logic blocks and also lack DSP and other heterogeneous block support. Modern FPGAs are instead composed of many different tiles, some of which are designed in a full custom style and some of which mix standard cell and full custom styles. To fill this modelling gap, we introduce COFFE 2, an open-source FPGA design toolset for automatic FPGA circuit design. COFFE 2 uses a mix of full custom and standard cell flows and supports not only complex logic blocks with fracturable lookup tables and hard arithmetic but also arbitrary heterogeneous blocks. To validate COFFE 2 and demonstrate its features, we design and evaluate a multi-mode Stratix III-like DSP block and several logic tiles with fracturable LUTs and hard arithmetic. We also demonstrate how COFFE 2’s interface to VTR allows full evaluation of block-routing interfaces and various fracturable 6-LUT architectures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it