MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911760195

A Zsolnay Gyár tündöklése és viszontagságai

2014· article· hu· W2911760195 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tamás Haffner

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagehu
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHungarian Social, Economic and Educational Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrotherQuarter (Canadian coin)Capital (architecture)State (computer science)Economic historyEngineeringArtVisual artsAncient historyHistoryLawPolitical scienceArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Zsolnay Porcelain Manufacture was the most important industrial unit in Pecs. The working class was the most determinative social group in the free royal city. The most factories were founded in the middle of the 19th century. Thanks to the industry became Pecs the economical centre of the South Transdanubian Region. The Zsolnay Porcelain Manufacture was founded by Vilmos Zsolnay in the 1860s. Vilmos Zsolnay was a very talented merchant, who bought his brother’s small manufactory, which became a word famous porcelain manufacture. Vilmos Zsolnay experimented a lot of new technologies, and made new types of ceramics like porcelain-fayance and eosin. Until his death he got more than twenty international prize. After the Word War II the socialist state conficted the manufacture, which was the end of the Zsolnay Porcelain Manufacture’s vicissitude. In the 1990s the state tried to sell the manufacture, but thanks to the state’s bad economical position it failed. In 2006 Pecs won the title of European Capital of Culture in 2010, and the city built the Zsolnay Cultural Quarter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.156

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0460.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHungarian Social, Economic and Educational StudiesFrench-language works237,207