MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911773734 · doi:10.1002/gj.3424

Sulphur and lead isotopic compositions of the Pb–Zn polymetallic deposits in the Linzizong volcanic area, Gangdese belt, Tibet: Implications for variation characteristics of ore‐forming material sources and exploration targeting

2019· article· en· W2911773734 on OpenAlexaff
Junsheng Jiang, Shunbao Gao, Youye Zheng, David R. Lentz, Yongchao Zhang, Jian Huang, Jun Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersChina Geological SurveyMinistry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of ChinaMinistry of Education of the People's Republic of China
KeywordsGeologyGeochemistryTerraneVolcanic rockVolcanic beltCrustBasementSubductionVolcanoTectonicsPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Relatively little attention has been given to variations in ore‐forming metal sources of Pb–Zn polymetallic deposits hosted in or near the Linzizong volcanic rocks from the eastern to western Gangdese belt. Based on the S and Pb isotopic data of typical Pb–Zn polymetallic deposits from the eastern to western Gangdese, the ore‐forming sources are discerned. The δ34SV‐CDT values of the typical Pb–Zn polymetallic deposits in the Gangdese metallogenic belt have a relatively large range of −11.6‰ to 6.0‰, different from those of the porphyry Cu ± Mo ± Au deposits (mainly vary from −2.0‰ to 1.0‰) in the Gangdese metallogenic belt, indicating that the sulphur in the ore‐forming fluid of Pb–Zn polymetallic deposits was dominantly of magmatic origin, but also influenced by strata nearby. The Nuocang and Beina deposits in the western Gangdese have a predominantly upper crustal source of Pb (average values: 207Pb/204Pb = 15.705, 208Pb/204Pb = 39.102), while the Narusongduo and Dexin deposits in the central Gangdese and the Leqingla and Xingaguo deposits in the eastern Gangdese are characterized by a mixed source in which Pb was derived from both the subducted slab and the ancient Lhasa basement. From the eastern to western Gangdese, Pb isotopic data show a gradually increasing scale of crustal materials from the Lhasa terrane basement. Combined with the geochemical data of the ore‐related intrusions and Linzizong volcanic rocks from the six deposits, or nearby, we proposed that the heterogeneity of Lhasa terrane crust resulted in more ancient Lhasa basement components contributing to ore‐forming sources from the eastern to western Gangdese. Moreover, relatively higher contents of Au, Ag elements could be identified in the Linzizong volcanic rocks of the western Gangdese than those of in the central and eastern Gangdese. Therefore, in addition to finding the cryptoexplosive breccia, epithermal, skarn, hydrothermal vein‐type Pb–Zn polymetallic deposits, there is exploration potential for epithermal Au–Ag deposits associated with the Linzizong volcanic rocks, western Gangdese.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological JournalSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207