Client Engagement in Child Protective Services Questionnaire : adéquation d’une version française et validation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’instrument de mesure multidimensionnel de l’engagement parental en contexte de protection de la jeunesse, le Client Engagement in Child Protective Services (Yatchmenoff, 2005) est évalué dans le cadre d’une étude en deux volets menée auprès de 123 parents québécois. L’adéquation d’une version française de l’instrument psychométrique est vérifiée, puis sa validité de construit est établie. La structure factorielle à quatre facteurs proposée par Yatchmenoff a été adéquatement reproduite. Les indices de cohérence interne et de qualité du modèle sont généralement satisfaisants et similaires à ceux de la version originale. La validité de construit a été établie via des liens avec des variables associées. L’emploi de l’instrument est recommandé considérant la richesse d’informations qu’il permet d’obtenir. Une réflexion doit se poursuivre quant à sa bonification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".