MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911794357 · doi:10.1016/j.molmet.2019.01.011

The brown adipose tissue glucagon receptor is functional but not essential for control of energy homeostasis in mice

2019· article· en· W2911794357 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Metabolism · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Institute on AgingBanting and Best Diabetes Centre, University of TorontoCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthMerck CanadaUniversity of TorontoNovo NordiskNovo Nordisk UK Research FoundationZafgenMerckCanadian Diabetes AssociationPfizerEli Lilly and CompanyShireDiabetes Canada
KeywordsEndocrinologyInternal medicineThermogenesisBrown adipose tissueGlucagon receptorAdipose tissueWhite adipose tissueGlucagonLipolysisEnergy homeostasisThermogeninGlucose homeostasisReceptorBiologyChemistryInsulinMedicineInsulin resistance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: Administration of glucagon (GCG) or GCG-containing co-agonists reduces body weight and increases energy expenditure. These actions appear to be transduced by multiple direct and indirect GCG receptor (GCGR)-dependent mechanisms. Although the canonical GCGR is expressed in brown adipose tissue (BAT) the importance of BAT GCGR activity for the physiological control of body weight, or the response to GCG agonism, has not been defined. Methods: We studied the mechanisms linking GCG action to acute increases in oxygen consumption using wildtype (WT), Ucp1 / and Fgf21 / mice. The importance of basal GCGR expression within the Myf5 domain for control of body weight, adiposity, glucose and lipid metabolism, food intake, and energy expenditure was examined in Gcgr BAT/ mice housed at room temperature or 4 C, fed a regular chow diet (RCD) or after a prolonged exposure to high fat diet (HFD). Results: Acute GCG administration induced lipolysis and increased the expression of thermogenic genes in BAT cells, whereas knockdown of Gcgr reduced expression of genes related to thermogenesis. GCG increased energy expenditure (measured by oxygen consumption) both in vivo in WT mice and ex vivo in BAT and liver explants. GCG also increased acute energy expenditure in Ucp1 / mice, but these actions were partially blunted in Ffg21 / mice. However, acute GCG administration also robustly increased oxygen consumption in Gcgr BAT/ mice. Moreover, body weight, glycemia, lipid metabolism, body temperature, food intake, activity, energy expenditure and adipose tissue gene expression profiles were normal in Gcgr BAT/ mice, either on RCD or HFD, whether studied at room temperature, or chronically housed at 4 C. Conclusions: Exogenous GCG increases oxygen consumption in mice, also evident both in liver and BAT explants ex vivo, through UCP1independent, FGF21-dependent pathways. Nevertheless, GCGR signaling within BAT is not physiologically essential for control of body weight, whole body energy expenditure, glucose homeostasis, or the adaptive metabolic response to cold or prolonged exposure to an energy dense diet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.388
Threshold uncertainty score0.900

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it