MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911795819 · doi:10.3138/jcfs.48.3.315

Between Social Rights and Human Rights: Israeli Mothers’ Right to be Protected from Poverty and Prostitution

2017· article· en· W2911795819 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Einat Lavee, Orly Benjamin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Comparative Family Studies · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Refugees, and Integration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEntitlement (fair division)Human rightsCitizenshipConceptualizationSocial rightsSociologyPovertySocial exclusionNormativePolitical scienceLawEconomicsPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the aftermath of the 2003 neoliberal welfare reform in Israel, impoverished mothers who have to provide for their children in a situation that deprived them of their social rights of citizenship have been forced to choose survival solutions that violate their human rights. Lister regards such violations as a process of social exclusion indicating second-class citizenship, whereas Regev-Messalem’s process of claiming citizenship, suggests active insistence on inclusion. We propose that the non-normative survival strategy that risks a mother’s right to control over her body provides a particularly relevant case for the conceptualization of excluded citizenship as accompanied by a sense of privatized entitlement. Narrative analysis of one interview from a qualitative study of 50 women struggling to provide for their children in poverty, we explore a non-normative form of survival: the payment of rent in the coin of sexual relationship positioning women between exclusion and belonging. Through this case, we explain the social process in which the violation of social rights becomes a violation of women’s human rights.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.020
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0000.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Comparative Family StudiesSame topicMigration, Refugees, and IntegrationFrench-language works237,207