Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le propos de cet article est d’analyser la façon dont l’entreprise éditoriale des Murray’s Handbooks for Travellers a contribué à la modification de la perception culturelle du monde et du voyage en proposant un produit livresque répondant aux attentes des tour-istes. Du premier Handbookfor Travellers on the Continent (1836) jusqu’à la huitième édition du Handbook for Travellers in India, Burma, and Ceylon (1911), nous nous proposons d’étudier le discours publicitaire qui se développe dans les guides Murray, en nous concentrant notamment sur l’Advertiser qui figure dans la majorité de ces ouvrages à la couverture rouge et publiés in a pocket volume – l’Advertiser, en général, étant loin d’être exclusivement consacré au pays dont parle le Handbook. Les Handbooks de Murray font du (guide de) voyage lui-même un produit semblable à ceux dont l’Advertiser fait la publicité : il s’agira donc pour nous de montrer en quoi ce nouveau support change la nature même du voyage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".