Demand Response Strategy Applied to Residential Electric Water Heaters Using Dynamic Programming and K-Means Clustering
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous studies have shown that electric water heaters (EWHs) have strong potential in demand-side management applications more precisely because they offer energy storage capability, so, can be employed as shift loads. However, the challenge of EWH curtailment strategies is to minimize the impact on the hot water availability while shaving the peak of consumption during critical periods. The success of such strategies depends highly on the knowledge of the consumption behavior of each user. Thus, appropriated modeling and consumption analysis could yield better management strategies. This study proposes an electric water heater control strategy based on the dynamic programming and power consumption profile classification. An adaptive clustering process allows recognizing the clients who contribute to the highest power consumption during the peak periods. The analysis and simulation indicate that an appropriate control on the group of users could be implemented to reduce the peak demand and to meet the hot water demand. A k-means clustering algorithm has been used for cluster analysis. The silhouette method has been applied to estimate the appropriate number of clusters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it