MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911910187 · doi:10.1109/lwc.2019.2895039

Deep Autoencoder Based CSI Feedback With Feedback Errors and Feedback Delay in FDD Massive MIMO Systems

2019· article· en· W2911910187 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Wireless Communications Letters · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceChannel state informationAutoencoderMIMOTelecommunications linkFeedback loopControl theory (sociology)Channel (broadcasting)Transmission (telecommunications)Deep learningArtificial intelligenceWirelessTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this letter, we study the channel state information (CSI) feedback based on the deep autoencoder (AE) considering the feedback errors and feedback delay in the frequency division duplex massive multiple-input multiple-output system. We construct the deep AE by modeling the CSI feedback process, which involves feedback transmission errors and delays. The deep AE is trained by setting the delayed version of the downlink channel as the desired output. The proposed scheme reduces the impact of the feedback errors and feedback delay. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed scheme achieves better performance than other comparable schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.504
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it