MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911917241 · doi:10.1109/jsyst.2019.2892581

Automated Post-Failure Service Restoration in Smart Grid Through Network Reconfiguration in the Presence of Energy Storage Systems

2019· article· en· W2911917241 on OpenAlexaff
Parisa Akaber, Bassam Moussa, Mourad Debbabi, Chadi Assi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Systems Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl reconfigurationSmart gridReliability engineeringComputer scienceEnergy storageElectric power systemService (business)Electric power transmissionDistributed generationGridDistributed computingPower (physics)EngineeringRenewable energyEmbedded systemElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Service restoration (SR) through network configuration in power systems is a highly investigated problem. In SR, utilities reconfigure the transmission and distribution networks to supply the consumer load demands. However, the advancements in distributed energy storage (DES) systems at the consumer side define a new dimension for SR. In this paper, we approach the network reconfiguration for SR in the presence of DES through mathematical modeling. We present a mathematical model that captures the properties of the power system, and reconfigures the network to supply consumer demand over available lines. This model considers power supply from DES, and proposes the least cost SR plan. We evaluate the proposed approach on the IEEE 14-, 30-, and 57-Bus systems, and report on the collected results. The collected results demonstrate the importance of the available DES in power SR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Systems JournalSame topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207