MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911917241 · doi:10.1109/jsyst.2019.2892581

Automated Post-Failure Service Restoration in Smart Grid Through Network Reconfiguration in the Presence of Energy Storage Systems

2019· article· en· W2911917241 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Systems Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl reconfigurationSmart gridReliability engineeringComputer scienceEnergy storageElectric power systemService (business)Electric power transmissionDistributed generationGridDistributed computingPower (physics)EngineeringRenewable energyEmbedded systemElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Service restoration (SR) through network configuration in power systems is a highly investigated problem. In SR, utilities reconfigure the transmission and distribution networks to supply the consumer load demands. However, the advancements in distributed energy storage (DES) systems at the consumer side define a new dimension for SR. In this paper, we approach the network reconfiguration for SR in the presence of DES through mathematical modeling. We present a mathematical model that captures the properties of the power system, and reconfigures the network to supply consumer demand over available lines. This model considers power supply from DES, and proposes the least cost SR plan. We evaluate the proposed approach on the IEEE 14-, 30-, and 57-Bus systems, and report on the collected results. The collected results demonstrate the importance of the available DES in power SR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.469

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it