MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912010176 · doi:10.1002/9781444345100.ch57

Subtrochanteric Fractures

2011· other· en· W2912010176 on OpenAlexaff
Steven Papp, Wade Gofton, Allan Liew

Bibliographic record

VenueEvidence-Based Orthopedics · 2011
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHip and Femur Fractures
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFemurHigh energySurgeryFixation (population genetics)Reduction (mathematics)PopulationDentistryEngineeringMathematicsEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures have a bimodal distribution. They occur as part of a high energy injury in a younger patient group or a lower energy injury in the elderly population. This has served as a clinical problem since many fractures are comminuted or occur in patients with osteoporotic bone. The forces in the subtrochanteric region are high and therefore the fixation must be adequate to overcome these forces while the bone heals. In many early studies, the failure rates were around 20%. Modern treatment has improved but this remains a “problem” fracture. Many questions exist – What is the best device; What is the best starting point when using a nail; Should open reduction be performed or is closed nailing a better option. In this chapter, we will attempt to give the best available evidence to some of these questions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0400.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEvidence-Based OrthopedicsSame topicHip and Femur FracturesFrench-language works237,207