MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912055016 · doi:10.1145/2806777

Proceedings of the Sixth ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing

2015· paratext· en· W2912055016 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of Software, Chinese Academy of SciencesInstitute for Infocomm ResearchUniversity of Massachusetts AmherstUniversity of California, Los AngelesNational Technical University of AthensUniversity of California, IrvineUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaPeking UniversityIndian Institute of Technology BombaySapienza Università di RomaFetzer InstituteTechnische Universität DresdenBeihang UniversityÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneYork UniversityNational ICT AustraliaVMwareUniversity of WaterlooMicrosoft ResearchNew York University Abu DhabiUniversity of California, San DiegoUniversity of TorontoUniversity of New South WalesUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraCarnegie Mellon UniversityUniversity of WashingtonPrinceton UniversityHarvard UniversityUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonArizona State UniversityBrown UniversityNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensChinese Academy of SciencesGoogleUniversity of Southern CaliforniaPurdue UniversityOhio State UniversityUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignMicrosoft
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingVery large databaseScope (computer science)BanquetData scienceWorld Wide WebDatabaseOperating systemHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The stated scope of SoCC is to be broad and encompass diverse data management and systems topics, and this year's 34 accepted papers are no exception. They touch on a wide range of data systems topics including new architectures, scheduling, performance modeling, high availability, replication, elasticity, migration, costs and performance trade-offs, complex analysis, and testing. The conference also includes 2 poster sessions (with 30 posters in addition to invited poster presentations for the accepted papers), keynotes by Eric Brewer of Google/UC Berkeley and Samuel Madden of MIT, and a social program that includes a banquet and a luncheon for students and senior systems and database researchers. The symposium is co-located with the 41st International Conference on Very Large Databases, VLDB 2015, highlighting the synergy between big data and the cloud.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0060.006
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCloud Computing and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207