MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912119416 · doi:10.3384/ecp19157543

Modeling of Low Temperature Thermal Networks Using Historical Building Data from District Energy Systems

2019· article· en· W2912119416 on OpenAlexafffund
Ryan Rogers, Vickram Lakhian, Marilyn Lightstone, James S. Cotton

Bibliographic record

VenueLinköping electronic conference proceedings · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOntario Centres of Excellence
KeywordsMicrogridEnvironmental scienceThermalPeriod (music)Energy (signal processing)Water heatingComputer scienceCivil engineeringArchitectural engineeringMeteorologyEngineeringElectrical engineeringRenewable energyWaste managementGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Modelica library for modelling and comparing District Energy Systems (DES) and Low Temperature Thermal Networks (LTTN) has been developed.The library consists of six unique models and a series of replaceable sub-models that allow for different scenarios for thermal energy generation.The fluid transport model and losses have been tuned using an empirical data set of a district energy system in operation.An analysis was performed to compare the performance of an existing, operational four-pipe DES against an alternative design that consists of two onepipe LTTN.The results show that the LTTN implementation can drastically reduce the natural gas usage and in turn the carbon emissions of a district energy plant by over 90% during a two-week period in the transitional month of October for a thermal microgrid in Southern Ontario, Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLinköping electronic conference proceedingsSame topicBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationFrench-language works237,207