MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912123949 · doi:10.1109/tcds.2019.2897618

Combined Sensing, Cognition, Learning, and Control for Developing Future Neuro-Robotics Systems: A Survey

2019· article· en· W2912123949 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsRoboticsArtificial intelligenceCognitive roboticsComputer scienceRobotEmbodied cognitionCognitionPerceptionDevelopmental roboticsCognitive neuroscienceHuman–computer interactionCognitive scienceNeurosciencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neuro-robotics systems (NRSs) is the current state-of-the-art research with the strategic alliance of neuroscience and robotics. It endows the next generation of robots with embodied intelligence to identify themselves and interact with humans and environments naturally. Therefore, it needs to study the interaction of recent breakthroughs in brain neuroscience, robotics, and artificial intelligence where smarter robots could be developed by employing neural mechanisms and understanding brain functions. Recently, more sophisticated neural mechanisms of perception, cognition, learning, and control have been decoded, which investigate how to define and develop the “brain” for future robots. In this paper, a comprehensive survey is summarized by recent achievements in neuro-robotics, and some potential directions for the development of future neuro-robotics are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.550
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it