MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912137682 · doi:10.25104/warlit.v25i7.746

Analisa Rencana Overlay Landas Pacu Bandar Udara Iskandar Pangkalan Bun, Terhadap Equivalent Single Wheel Load (ESWL) Pesawat Boeing 737-900 ER

2019· article· id· W2912137682 on OpenAlexaff
Ataline Muliasari, M Herry Purnama

Bibliographic record

VenueWarta Penelitian Perhubungan · 2019
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical and construction materials studies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bandar udara Iskandar yang terus berupaya meningkatkan kualitas pelayanan penerbangan bagi masyarakat pengguna, berencana melakukan pengembangan fasilitas landas pacu dari 1.850 meter menjadi 2.250 meter. Pemanjangan fasilitas landas pacu sepanjang 350 meter ini diharapkan agar pesawat udara berbadan lebar dapat mendarat di bandar udara Iskandar yang saat ini baru dapat didarati oleh pesawat dengan tipe 737500. Analisa rencana overlay landas pacu bandar udara Iskandar Pangkalan Bun, terhadap Equivalent Single Whell Load (ESWL) pesawat Boeing 737-900ER ini dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui ketebalan rencana lapisan perkerasan landas pacu yang akan di overlay terhadap equivalent single wheel load (ESWL) pesawat hoeing 737-900 ER. Sementara itu, perurnusan masalah dari pengkajian ini adalah apakah rencana tebal perkerasan overlay fasilitas landas pacu di Bandar Udara Pangkalan Bun telah memenuhi persyaratan untuk dapat didarati pesawat tipe Boeing 737-900 ER. Bandar Udara Iskandar pangkalan Bun akan melakukan overlay setebal 7,5 cm. sehingga flexible pavement yang semula setebal 80 cm akan menjadi setebal 87,5 cm. tetapi, dari hasil perhitungan terlihat bahwa tebal pavement minimal adalah 88 cm. oleh sebab itu terdapat selisih tebal lapisan perkerasan hasil perhitungan dengan rencana sebesar 0.25 cm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWarta Penelitian PerhubunganSame topicGeotechnical and construction materials studiesFrench-language works237,207