Ставлення Української Центральної Ради до православної церкви(Attitude of the Ukrainian Central Council to the Orthodox Church)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Автором розглядається ставлення Центральної Ради до православної церкви в період національно-визвольних змагань 1917-21 рр. Останнє визначалося, в першу чергу, фактором домінування соціалістичних переконань, як наприкінці XIX, так і у першій чверті XX ст. Втім, стверджувати про однозначне ставлення представників Центральної Ради до церкви не можна, адже до неї також входили і церковні діячі, які відстоювали позицію українізації церкви та поступового відокремлення від Росії. Офіційна ж позиція Центральної Ради стосовно ставлення до церкви була висловлена тільки наприкінці грудня 1917 року та вказувала на приватний характер релігійної сфери життя. (The author examines the attitude of the Central Council to the Orthodox Church during the national struggle in 1917-1921. It was determined primarily by the dominance of socialistic convictions in the late XIX century and in the first quarter of the XX century. However, it is not possible to state about the definite attitude of the Central Council to the Church, because the council also included church leaders who defended the Ukrainization of church and gradual separation from Russia. The official position of the Central Council regarding the position to the Church was expressed only at the end of December in 1917 and it was underlined that the religious sphere was a private thing for everyone.)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".