MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912150496 · doi:10.1177/096369350401300105

Internal Stresses and Warpage of Thin Composite Parts Manufactured by RTM

2004· article· en· W2912150496 on OpenAlexaff
Édu Ruiz, F. Trochu, R. Gauvin

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Composites Letters · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEpoxy Resin Curing Processes
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceThermosetting polymerComposite materialShrinkageComposite numberTransfer moldingRheologyFinite element methodYield (engineering)Sheet moulding compoundInjection mouldingStructural engineeringMold

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resin transfer moulding (RTM) is a widely used manufacturing technique of composite parts. A proper selection of process parameters is the key to yield successful moulding results and obtain a good part. Among other things, when thermoset resins are processed, the shrinkage that occurs due to the polymerisation reaction further complicates the situation. In this paper, a finite difference analysis is proposed to simulate the effect of thermal and rheological changes during thin plates cooling after processing. Classical Laminate Theory is here implemented to compute composite internal stresses resulting from these thermo-rheological conditions. Laminate stresses are then computed and warpage obtained with the proposed numerical algorithm. Samples of thin plates were moulded combining two glass reinforcement materials. During cooling, after processing plates warpage was recorded and results compared to model predictions. This analysis presents the basis of a further numerical optimisation for thick composite parts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Composites LettersSame topicEpoxy Resin Curing ProcessesFrench-language works237,207