MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912151581 · doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.8b02528

Dehydration, Micellization, and Phase Separation of Thermosensitive Polyoxazoline Star Block Copolymers in Aqueous Solution

2019· article· en· W2912151581 on OpenAlexaff
Tetiana Sezonenko, Xing‐Ping Qiu, Françoise M. Winnik, Takahiro Sato

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of Science
KeywordsCopolymerCloud pointPolymer chemistryMicelleSmall-angle X-ray scatteringPolymerMaterials scienceCore (optical fiber)Hydrodynamic radiusTurbidimetryChemistryPhase (matter)Aqueous solutionChemical engineeringScatteringPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryChromatographyPhysicsOpticsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Suitably end-functionalized diblock copolymers (2-isopropyl-2-oxazoline)-b-(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) (PIPOZ-b-PEOZ) were linked to a tetrafunctional core to synthesize two isomeric thermosensitive 4-arm star block polymers which have the PIPOZ block near the core, core-(PIPOZ-b-PEOZ)4, or near the outer surface the star polymer, core-(PEOZ-b-PIPOZ)4. The solution properties of the star copolymers in water were monitored by turbidimetry, microcalorimetry, and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS). The dehydration and cloud-point temperatures of both core-(PIPOZ-b-PEOZ)4 and core-(PEOZ-b-PIPOZ)4 in water are in the vicinity of 50 °C. Above this temperature, core-(PIPOZ-b-PEOZ)4 forms starlike aggregates or star micelle, whereas core-(PEOZ-b-PIPOZ)4 remains isolated, with no sign of aggregation. These results demonstrate the importance of chain architecture on the association of thermosensitive tetra-arm star block copolymers in water above the dehydration temperature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.584

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromoleculesSame topicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and CharacterizationFrench-language works237,207